- XXA
- <
- 1
- >

Appendix I
MSS of Revelation—Gregory
This list is based on Hoskier’s groupings of MSS, but giving the Gregory numbers (with additions and changes as noted).
Odd Uncials—𝕻18𝕻24𝕻43𝕻47𝕻85𝕻98𝕻115ℵ,A,C,025,051,0163,0169,0207,0308*Hoskier does not have 𝕻43,47,85,98,115,0207,0308, of course.
MS Count: 16
—————
M c—35,432,757[1:1–21:9],824,986,1064†1064, 1903, 2201, 2323, 2431, 2434, 2554, 2656, 2669 and 2723 are not in Hoskier’s collation.,1072,1075,1248,1328, 1384‡Josef Schmid assigned 1384 to M c and I agree; Hoskier assigned it to M d. Hoskier also assigned 1732 to M d, but I have changed it to M c (it has a curious mixture of the two profiles).,1503,1551,1617,1637,1652frag,1732,1733,1740,1745,1746,1771,1774,1864,1865,1894[3:12–22:21],1903[5:12–22:21],1957,2023,2035,2041,2061,2196,2201,2323,2352,2431,2434,2554,2656,2669,2723§I have done a thorough collation of 2723—it is a very high quality representative of the family in the 11th century.,2821,{61,69,2351}
MS Count: {3} + 43
—————
M d—88,1854,1876,2014,2015,2030[2034]*I have enclosed in [ ] MSS indicated by Hoskier as copies of other extant MSS. Thus, in M d cursive 2034 is a copy of 2036; in M e cursive 2029 is a copy of 2028, and both 205 and 205abs are copies of 209; in Ma-Mb cursive 2258 is a copy of 2076; in M i cursive 2078 is a copy of 2436. If we ignore these known duplicates, M d comes out with 14 MSS, M e with 28, Ma-Mb with 16, and M i with 10. The sub-groups within { } are related to the main group, but not totally aligned.2036,2037,2042[11:1–22:21],2043,2046,2047,2074,2082
MS Count: (14) 15
M e—181[205,205abs]209,598,1894[1:1–3:12],2022,2026,2028[2029]2031,2033,2038,2044,2045,2049,2052,2054,2056,2057,2059, 2060,2065,2068,2069,2081,2083,2091,2186,2286,2302,2814 {522,743,2042[1:1–10:11],2051,2055,2064,2067,2087}
MS Count: {7} + (28) 31
M h—052,911,1006,1611,1678,1778,1841,2020,2050,2053,2062,2080,2329
MS Count: 13
—————
M b—172,250,424,616,1828,1862,1888,2018,2032,2084
MS Count: 10
M f—91,175,242,314,617,664,1094,1934,2016(2070-2305[1:1–11:19]) 2075,2077
MS Count: 11
M g—104,336,459,582,620,628,680,922,1918
MS Count: 9
M a—046,82,93,141,218,254,632,919,1719,1893,1955,2004,2024,2073,2079,2200,2254,2824
MS Count: 18
Ma-Mb—18,177,180,337,498,920,1704,1859,2027,2039,2058(2070-2305[12:1–22:21])2076,2138,2256[2258]
MS Count: (16) 17
Ma-Mc—42,367,468,757s[21:10–22:21] ,1626
MS Count: 4
Ma-Md—149,201,203,368,386,452,467,506,935,1597,1728,1734,1849,1948,2021,2025
MS Count: 16
Ma-Me—385,429,808,2325(?)
MS Count: 4
Ma-Mg—110,325,456,517,627,2048
MS Count: 6
M i—94,241,256,469,792,1852,2017,2019,2071[2078]2436
MS Count: (10) 11
—————
misc.—296,699,1775,1777,1903[1:1–5:11]
MS Count: 4
Total MS Count: 238
Comment: As illustrated by this stemma, I posit three main lines of transmission. It follows that if h agrees with f 35 against d,e (and a,b,f,g,i) then in 150 we could have two lines against one. Similarly, if g or b agrees with f 35 against the rest, then in 150 we could have two lines against one. In such an event there would have to be comparison going on—in the first case either h assimilated to f 35 (if the rest have the true reading) or d,e assimilated to a,b,f,g,i (or f 35 did the assimilating).

- XXA
- <
- 1
- >

*^ Hoskier does not have 𝕻43,47,85,98,115,0207,0308, of course.

†^ 1064, 1903, 2201, 2323, 2431, 2434, 2554, 2656, 2669 and 2723 are not in Hoskier’s collation.

‡^ Josef Schmid assigned 1384 to Mc and I agree; Hoskier assigned it to Md. Hoskier also assigned 1732 to Md, but I have changed it to Mc (it has a curious mixture of the two profiles).

§^ I have done a thorough collation of 2723—it is a very high quality representative of the family in the 11th century.

*^ I have enclosed in [ ] MSS indicated by Hoskier as copies of other extant MSS. Thus, in Md cursive 2034 is a copy of 2036; in Me cursive 2029 is a copy of 2028, and both 205 and 205abs are copies of 209; in Ma-Mb cursive 2258 is a copy of 2076; in Mi cursive 2078 is a copy of 2436. If we ignore these known duplicates, Md comes out with 14 MSS, Me with 28, Ma-Mb with 16, and Mi with 10. The sub-groups within { } are related to the main group, but not totally aligned.

© 2020 Wilbur N. Pickering